What are the four main significant gaps of the leaked Commission's proposal on the regulation of #ArtificialIntelligence? Read my analysis in my latest blog post: https://www.kolaja.eu/en/post/20210420-leaked_commissions_plan_on_artificial_intelligence_four_significant_gaps/?mtm_campaign=mastodon&mtm_kwd=ai&mtm_source=mastodon&mtm_medium=mastodon&mtm_content=four_gaps_of_ai_regulation_leak&mtm_group=post&mtm_placement=post
I for one don't want “public security”. I want clear rights and duties and a fair & efficient legal system that understands that protecting fundamental rights ≠ protecting states at all costs, much less providing them with impunity.
You should not fall for marketing terms like "AI" or "machine learning". Instead you should make clear that it doesn't matter what kind of algorithm is implemented (in this case statistical inference ones), *there must always be someone responsible*. This way who wants to use statistical inference or whatever will do so in a safer way.
In general people use algorithms and protocols (not only the computer ones) as a shield from responsabilities.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!